IAMRoadmapIAMRoadmap
General
6 min read

Okta vs Microsoft Entra ID: In-Depth Comparison for Enterprise IAM

Detailed comparison of Okta and Microsoft Entra ID for enterprise identity management. Features, pricing, integrations, and which to choose.

I

IAM Roadmap Team

IAM Security Expert

December 25, 2025

Executive Summary

Choosing between Okta and Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory) is one of the most important decisions for enterprise identity and access management. Both are industry leaders, but they excel in different scenarios.

Quick Recommendation:

  • Choose Okta if: You need best-in-class identity with vendor neutrality and extensive third-party integrations
  • Choose Microsoft Entra ID if: You're heavily invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems

Company Overview

Okta

  • Founded: 2009
  • Headquarters: San Francisco, CA
  • Public Since: 2017 (NASDAQ: OKTA)
  • Focus: Identity-first, vendor-neutral approach
  • Key Acquisition: Auth0 (2021) - Developer identity platform

Microsoft Entra ID

  • Launched: 2010 (as Azure AD)
  • Rebranded: 2023 (as Microsoft Entra ID)
  • Parent Company: Microsoft Corporation
  • Focus: Integrated Microsoft ecosystem security
  • Integration: Native to Microsoft 365, Azure, Windows

Feature Comparison

Single Sign-On (SSO)

FeatureOktaMicrosoft Entra ID
Pre-built app integrations7,500+3,500+
SAML 2.0 support
OIDC/OAuth 2.0
WS-Federation
Custom app integrationExcellentGood
SWA (Password vaulting)✅ (limited)

Winner: Okta - More pre-built integrations and better support for non-Microsoft applications.

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)

FeatureOktaMicrosoft Entra ID
Push notificationsOkta VerifyMicrosoft Authenticator
TOTP
SMS/Voice
Hardware tokens (FIDO2)
BiometricWindows Hello
Passwordless
Adaptive MFA✅ (Conditional Access)

Winner: Tie - Both offer comprehensive MFA with slight differences in implementation.

Lifecycle Management

FeatureOktaMicrosoft Entra ID
HR-driven provisioning
SCIM provisioning✅ (excellent)✅ (good)
Group-based provisioning
Workflow automationOkta WorkflowsLogic Apps / Lifecycle Workflows
Self-service capabilities

Winner: Okta - More mature provisioning with better third-party HR system support.

Security & Compliance

FeatureOktaMicrosoft Entra ID
Risk-based authenticationOkta ThreatInsightIdentity Protection
Compromised credential detection
Impossible travel detection
Session management
Privileged access management✅ (via acquisition)✅ (PIM)
Compliance certificationsSOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMPSOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, more

Winner: Microsoft Entra ID - Deeper security analytics and native integration with Microsoft security stack.

Pricing Comparison

Okta Pricing (Per User/Month)

PlanPriceKey Features
SSO$2-5Basic SSO, MFA
Adaptive SSO$5-8+ Adaptive MFA, ThreatInsight
Lifecycle Management$4-8+ Provisioning, workflows
Identity Governance$8++ Access certifications, reporting

Microsoft Entra ID Pricing (Per User/Month)

PlanPriceKey Features
Free$0Basic features with M365
P1$6Conditional Access, self-service
P2$9+ Identity Protection, PIM
Governance$7 (add-on)+ Lifecycle Workflows, access reviews

Winner: Microsoft Entra ID - Better value if you're already in Microsoft ecosystem.

Integration Capabilities

Okta Integrations

Strengths:

  • 7,500+ pre-built integrations
  • Excellent SaaS application support
  • Strong developer tools and APIs
  • Okta Integration Network (OIN)

Key Integrations:

  • Salesforce, Workday, ServiceNow
  • AWS, GCP, all major cloud platforms
  • Slack, Zoom, Box
  • Any SAML/OIDC application

Microsoft Entra ID Integrations

Strengths:

  • Native Microsoft 365 integration
  • Deep Azure integration
  • Windows device management
  • Microsoft security ecosystem

Key Integrations:

  • Microsoft 365, Azure, Dynamics
  • Teams, SharePoint, Power Platform
  • Windows Autopilot
  • Microsoft Defender suite

Winner: Depends on your environment

  • Multi-cloud/SaaS-heavy: Okta
  • Microsoft-centric: Entra ID

Use Case Recommendations

Choose Okta When:

  1. You have a diverse application landscape: Many third-party SaaS applications
  2. You need vendor neutrality: Don't want to be locked into Microsoft
  3. You prioritize best-of-breed IAM: Identity is your primary focus
  4. You have complex provisioning needs: Multiple HR systems, complex workflows
  5. You're a developer-focused organization: Need Auth0 capabilities

Choose Microsoft Entra ID When:

  1. You're heavily invested in Microsoft: M365, Azure, Windows
  2. You want integrated security: Microsoft Defender, Sentinel
  3. Budget is a primary concern: Already paying for M365
  4. You need Windows management: Device and identity together
  5. You want a single vendor: Simplicity over best-of-breed

Consider Both (Hybrid) When:

  1. You have Microsoft and diverse SaaS: Use Entra ID for Microsoft, Okta for others
  2. You're in a transition period: Migrating to or from Microsoft
  3. You have specific compliance requirements: Different regions or regulations

Migration Considerations

Migrating to Okta

Pros:

  • Excellent migration tools
  • Professional services available
  • Phased approach possible

Cons:

  • Can be complex for large enterprises
  • May require application reconfiguration
  • User re-enrollment for MFA

Migrating to Microsoft Entra ID

Pros:

  • Seamless if already using M365
  • Integrated tooling available
  • Good documentation

Cons:

  • May lose some advanced features
  • Complex for non-Microsoft applications
  • Potential licensing changes

Real-World Decision Framework

Ask yourself these questions:

  1. What percentage of your applications are Microsoft?

    • 70%: Lean toward Entra ID

    • <50%: Lean toward Okta
  2. What's your cloud strategy?

    • Azure-first: Entra ID
    • Multi-cloud: Okta
  3. What's your budget situation?

    • Already paying for M365: Consider Entra ID
    • Greenfield: Evaluate both
  4. How important is vendor independence?

    • Critical: Okta
    • Not important: Either
  5. What's your security stack?

    • Microsoft security: Entra ID
    • Best-of-breed security: Either

Conclusion

Both Okta and Microsoft Entra ID are excellent identity platforms. The best choice depends on your existing technology investments, application landscape, and strategic priorities.

Our Recommendation:

  • Most Microsoft shops: Start with Entra ID P2, consider Okta for specific needs
  • Diverse environments: Okta provides better flexibility
  • Startups: Consider Auth0 (Okta) for developer-friendly identity

Whatever you choose, ensure you have a clear identity strategy and implement strong security practices like MFA and Zero Trust principles.

Related Topics

OktaMicrosoft Entra IDAzure ADIdP ComparisonSSOEnterprise IAM

Found this helpful?

Share it with your network